KIRI CAMPBELL

Nu Tireni · Evidence Series · Part 40 · Cabinet Advice Reconstruction

What advice did Cabinet receive about the United Tribes flag in 2009?

Part 39 located the Cabinet minute. Part 40 reconstructs the advice trail around it. We still do not have the complete primary Cabinet file in hand. But a contemporaneous scholarly study, based on documents released under the Official Information Act, identifies the Te Puni Kōkiri memo, the consultation reports, the 8 December Cabinet paper and CAB Min (09) 44/15 — and preserves several important details about what officials and submitters said.

OIA-released recordsSecondary reconstructionPrimary file still required

First control: this is a reconstruction, not yet the full Cabinet file

The strongest source presently located is Ewan Morris' 2010 study in the Journal of New Zealand Studies. Its footnotes identify primary records released under the Official Information Act: a Te Puni Kōkiri memo to the Minister of Māori Affairs dated 3 June 2009, reports from the consultation hui and the consultation summary, the 14 December Cabinet minute CAB Min (09) 44/15, and Pita Sharples' 8 December 2009 paper to the Cabinet Domestic Policy Committee.

Evidence boundaryBecause the complete OIA-release bundle has not yet been independently obtained and checked page by page, claims about the contents of those primary records are attributed to the published reconstruction. They are not presented as direct quotations from documents we have personally verified.

The option set was deliberately constructed before the public consultation

The 2009 consultation did not simply ask the public to nominate any flag. Four options were placed before participants: the Tino Rangatiratanga flag, the United Tribes flag, the New Zealand Flag and the New Zealand Red Ensign.

Morris reports, citing the 3 June 2009 Te Puni Kōkiri memo, that a wider range of flags had been considered before those four were selected. Other flags were apparently excluded because officials considered them too closely associated with the colonial past, too closely associated with particular iwi, or affected by intellectual-property concerns.

New questionWhat criteria did Te Puni Kōkiri use to include the United Tribes flag while excluding other flags as too colonial or too iwi-specific? That selection decision may reveal how officials characterised the 1834 flag before consultation even began.

The United Tribes flag received a significant minority vote

The consultation produced 1,220 oral and written submissions. Approximately 80 percent selected the Tino Rangatiratanga flag. The published reconstruction records that 16 percent selected the United Tribes flag.

That result matters because it is more informative than the later shorthand that “80 percent chose Tino Rangatiratanga”. The United Tribes flag was not merely nominally listed: it attracted the overwhelming majority of the remaining preference.

Tino Rangatiratanga flag

Supporters emphasised that it was designed by Māori for Māori, represented unity, mana and self-determination, and was future-focused.

United Tribes flag

Supporters emphasised its historical significance. That tells us the historical argument was already present in the consultation record in 2009.

That historical-significance evidence is important for 28 October

The present 28 October request is not asking Government to reverse the 2009 preference vote or replace the Tino Rangatiratanga flag as the preferred national Māori flag. It asks Government to recognise a particular historical relationship between the 1834 flag and He Wakaputanga on the anniversary of that instrument.

The 2009 consultation record appears to contain exactly that distinction in embryonic form: support for Tino Rangatiratanga was framed around modern Māori identity and self-determination, while support for the United Tribes flag was framed around historical significance.

Campaign consequenceThe 2009 result can support, rather than defeat, the 2026 request. It shows that the United Tribes flag occupied a different evidential lane even within the original consultation.

The 8 December Cabinet paper appears to have contemplated future legal development

Morris reports that Pita Sharples' paper to the Cabinet Domestic Policy Committee on 8 December 2009 referred at paragraph 22 to the possibility of amending the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981 at some future time, depending on practice arising from the proposal.

The same paper reportedly said at paragraph 24 that the initial focus would be flying the selected flag on Waitangi Day.

Why this mattersIf accurately reported, Cabinet was not simply deciding which picture to place on a bridge. Ministers were considering a policy that might develop into future statutory recognition, while deliberately beginning with a limited commemorative practice.

But Cabinet still did not resolve the United Tribes flag's historical status

The available record shows a policy exercise to select and recognise a preferred national Māori flag. It does not show Cabinet deciding whether King William IV's recognition of the 1834 flag had continuing legal effect, whether the flag retained any official status after 1840, or what constitutional significance should be given to its express reference in He Wakaputanga.

Indeed, the later Government historical account describes the Tino Rangatiratanga flag as the preferred national Māori flag while separately recording the United Tribes flag as New Zealand's first official flag. Those are different classifications.

A second historical clue appears in what happened at Waitangi in 2010

The same published study records that the Waitangi National Trust did not fly the Tino Rangatiratanga flag at the Waitangi Treaty Grounds in 2010, in part because of opposition from nearby Te Tii marae and the preference of many northern Māori for the United Tribes flag.

That does not determine legal status. But it reinforces that the 2009 Cabinet decision did not produce a uniform Māori view that the United Tribes flag had been displaced in every context.

The exact primary records now have names and dates

  1. Te Puni Kōkiri memo to the Minister of Māori Affairs — 3 June 2009. We need the complete memo and all attachments showing how candidate flags were assessed and selected.
  2. Kia Whakamana he Haki Māori / Recognising a National Māori Flag — July 2009 consultation brochure. We need the complete wording and historical description supplied to participants for each option.
  3. Reports of the 21 consultation hui and the consultation results summary. We need the regional breakdown, qualitative comments and all references to the United Tribes flag.
  4. Pita Sharples' Cabinet Domestic Policy Committee paper — 8 December 2009. In particular paragraphs 22 and 24, plus all advice on legal status and the Flags Act.
  5. CAB Min (09) 44/15 — 14 December 2009. We need the full minute and any recorded qualifications, implementation directions or agency responsibilities.
  6. Implementation records for Waitangi Day 2010. These should show how Cabinet's decision was translated into instructions to the Ministry of Transport and bridge operator.

Finding at this stage

Finding 40The 2009 decision trail was more structured than the public press release suggests. Te Puni Kōkiri first narrowed a larger set of possible flags to four. The public then produced 1,220 submissions; about 80 percent preferred Tino Rangatiratanga and 16 percent preferred the United Tribes flag. The published OIA-based reconstruction records different reasoning behind those choices: modern Māori design, unity and self-determination for Tino Rangatiratanga, and historical significance for the United Tribes flag. Pita Sharples' 8 December Cabinet paper reportedly contemplated possible future amendment of the Flags Act while initially limiting the practice to Waitangi Day. None of that, on the record presently located, shows Cabinet adjudicating the constitutional or legal status of the 1834 flag. The next evidential step is therefore to obtain and publish the underlying 2009 OIA records themselves.

Sources

Ewan Morris — “Banner Headlines: The Māori Flag Debate in Comparative Perspective”, Journal of New Zealand Studies ↗

Manatū Taonga — 2009 national Māori flag consultation ↗

Te Puni Kōkiri — 2010 Annual Report, National Māori Flag ↗

DPMC — 2014 Cabinet paper citing CAB Min (09) 44/15 ↗

← PreviousSeries index28 October request →

Original writing © Kiri Campbell. Please share the page link; request permission before reproducing original content. Third-party material remains attributed to its sources.