Māori Status in New Zealand Law · Enforcement Ledger · Part 48 · Care and protection

What lets Oranga Tamariki or Police remove a child from a place of danger?

Care-and-protection intervention is statutory. The Oranga Tamariki Act creates specific investigation, warrant, custody and court-order pathways; removal is not a general executive power.

Child-protection enforcement must be separated into emergency powers, warrants, interim arrangements and Family Court orders.

Section 39 of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 allows a District Court Judge, Family Court Associate or issuing officer to issue a place-of-safety warrant where the statutory decision-maker is satisfied there are reasonable grounds for suspecting a child or young person is suffering, or is likely to suffer, specified forms of harm.

The warrant threshold matters.A care-and-protection concern does not automatically authorise every form of entry or removal. The person exercising the power must be able to identify the statutory route relied on and satisfy its threshold.

CompulsionEntry/search under warrant, removal to a place of safety, interim custody and later court orders.

Primary instrumentOranga Tamariki Act 1989.

TriggerDepends on the particular power; s 39 uses a reasonable-grounds threshold relating to specified harm.

ControlJudicial authorisation where required, statutory principles, procedural rights, Family Court oversight and review/appeal mechanisms.

The enforcement audit is therefore factual and legal: which power was used, who authorised it, what evidence met the threshold, and what happened after the intervention?

Primary statuteOranga Tamariki Act 1989, including s 39.

← Series index · Previous · Next →